Georgia did away with the D in its public schools a long time ago. The reason I know this is that when I moved to Georgia as a junior in high school, which was almost exactly twenty years ago, I had a D in biology on my transcript, and my counselor explained that because it was a passing grade where I came from, the Georgia school to which I was transferring would consider it a passing grade; however, he let me know that grades below 70 were failing grades in Georgia. I guess that means if you go by the old dictum that A’s are excellent, B’s are above average, C’s are average, and F’s are failing, then in Georgia, you drop from average work to failing work if you find yourself on the other side of that 70.
Private schools, however, are free to retain the D, and my school uses the A-F +/- grading scale. I have to say that having worked with both scales, I believe the D has merit. There is a gap between average performance and failing performance, and I think the D serves that gap well. Below average. The warning before you fail. The impetus to do better. It’s a nice cushion for the students, and I think it might prevent grade inflation. I am almost sure a chemistry teacher in high school gave me a 70 I didn’t earn because I worked hard, was generally quiet, and turned in all my assignments. I just had a very hard time with the subject. I can’t really say my knowledge of chemistry was average as high school student. It was probably below average. Maybe it’s just me, but I see a difference between doing average work and doing failing work.
What do you think, though? Do D’s serve a purpose? Is Georgia wrong to delete the D?